• Home
  • About Us
  • Research
  • Links
  • Contact
  • Events

Currency Intervention: Kiwis don’t fly

June 27th, 2007

On June 11th the RBNZ intervened in the NZ$ by selling NZ$ around the US$0.7660 level in thin markets. This was followed up by another bout or two resulting in short term sell offs to US$0.76.

This action has create a fair bit of comment most of it apoplectic in nature focusing on the poor NZ central bank against the might of global speculators. The commentary uniformly blasted the RB and trotted out the story of how George Soros buried the Bank of England back in 1992.

Well this is one time i can say “i was there” as i was actually trading Stg at the time, with the regular trader lying on a beach in the Carribean. It was a crazy time to be in the markets but when you were the focal point of action that feeling was magnified. The Bank of England phone line was running hot as we called up to sell more and more Stg. The voice on the other end of the phone was resigned to the ship going down.

It duly did. The next day i had my biggest one day loss in 12 years of trading as the market all but disappeared and every customer was looking to trade. I remember my broker took me out to dinner at the casino in Park Lane to recover. Nice.

But the main point of this story is that Stg was way overvalued and stuck in the ERM where it was required under the Maastricht Treaty to keep the Pound above a certain level which was DM2.7780.

So the Old Lady was just doing her job. She wasn’t taking on Soros or the market but just fulfilling legal obligations. Soros made a bet that the UK would have to pull out of the ERM and that was a political action and you can be sure he would have done his homework there.

So it is very different to what we see when the BOJ intervenes in the Yen at 100 or 145 where there is no legal cap but an extreme extension in rates.

The RBNZ action falls into this camp. The NZ$ is appreciating well beyond fundamentals based on the current account deficit, PPP comparisons and problems for the export sector to sell its goods. It is also suffering from carry trade side effects which are causing a huge inflow of short term investment to take advantage of high interest rates.

Its intervention is justified on those grounds. The NZ$ should be trading around US$0.60 which is just above its long term average. Of course currency rates can run way beyond what might be considered justifiable and for some period of time.

The Great Game continues in the global financial markets where the US sells it paper to trading nations such as Japan and now China in return for goods. One day this game may stop and the US$ will go into freefall.

The same could happen to the NZ$. I would say the RBNZ intervention is justified though how effective it is remains to be seen. Jeff Gamlin at the NBR is quite positive on the profit implications and it’s certainly a good long term trade to buy some foreign reserves. They should be selling as much Kiwi as possible!

As it happens intervention usually works if the intervening bank has some justification. Remember currency speculators like to make money. They don’t care whether it’s up or down.

The RBNZ is in a tight spot regardless of what Grant Spencer, the Deputy Governor , says. They will need a bit of luck to get this right and will need to continue intervening if required at higher levels like 78 and 80. I think though they will be safe there as people are starting to feel the pinch of higher rates.

Also yesterday the Japanese Minister of Finance weighed into the fray with some well placed comments. The Japanese are the experts in intervention and jawboning the currency. That shot across the bows should not be ignored.

Tags: bank of england, carry trade, central banks, economics, forex, intervention, japan, markets, new zealand, reserve bank of new zealand

3 Responses to “Currency Intervention: Kiwis don’t fly”

  1. sustento.org.nz » Blog Archive » Volatile Markets - par for the course Says:
    August 5th, 2007 at 9:48 am

    [...] the sub-prime meltdown in the US and it turned into a rout which could continue further. As i noted previously the Kiwi was at a level worth selling and could fall much further especially if the crosses get [...]

  2. sustento.org.nz » Blog Archive » Kiwibank: Its all ours Says:
    October 20th, 2008 at 9:59 pm

    [...] suggested in June 07 that the RB use the opportunity of the high NZ$ to buy as much foreign currency as possible whilst [...]

  3. sustento.org.nz » Blog Archive » Currency Intervention: Kiwis don’t fly (Episode 2) Says:
    August 13th, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    [...] back then I suggested the RBNZ should think about selling as much NZ$ as they could. Why? Why go against prevailing market [...]

Leave a Reply

  •  

    I’m a Londoner who moved to Christchurch, New Zealand in 2002. After studying economics and finance at Manchester University and a couple of years of backpacking, I ended up working in the financial markets in London. I traded the global financial markets on behalf of investment banks for 11 years. I write about the intersection of economic, social and environmental issues . My prime interest is in designing better systems to create a better world. I welcome comments and input.

    Follow me on Twitter

    Tag Cloud

    amnesty banking bank of england central banks china climate change credit credit crunch currencies debt economics ecosystem environment externalities federal reserve financial crisis food forex fossil fuels freedom future global warming greenhouse gas emissions human rights inflation interest intervention investing markets microfinance money money reform money supply mortgage new zealand oil p2p policy ideas politics repression reserve bank of new zealand sustainability systems un declaration of human rights violence
  • Recent Comments:

    • maria morris: I love the disruptive idea of starting from scratch. I believe a key to Jaime Lerner’s impact is...
    • Dai: Bringing back home the Cullen Fund is a great no-brainer that seriously needs to get some air time.
    • Lisa: I also heard you on RadioNZ and looked up your site. I really enjoyed your ideas and explanations. Being born...
    • Raf Manji: Hi Lissie, - No means testing at all. It just becomes part of your taxable income. - It’s universal...
    • Lissie: Its an interesting idea- I heard you on RadioNZ – and looked up your site. Would this guaranteed wage...
  •  

    Subscribe to the RSS Feed
    Enter your email address:

  • Archives

    • December 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • June 2010
    • March 2010
    • January 2010
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007

Home | About Us | Research | Links | Contact

© 2007 Sustento Instuitute