Suddenly food is top of the global humanitarian agenda. Policymakers now realise something major has to be done after 7 years of feast lest 7 years of famine take hold.

Whether its due to bio-fuels or falling farm output, the situation is the same. People cannot afford to buy food.

It’s interesting that in the drive to grow manufacturing and service industries, agriculture has been relegated to a has been and rather dull business. But as we know we all need our daily bread and this rather sharp reminder will see farming regain its importance as a primary and important piece of industry.

This may even be the straw that breaks the back of farming subsidies.  But we may be facing a period of high food prices with the embedded cost of oil at every place in the supply chain.

If there’s an answer its to eliminate subsidies (this from 5 years ago)and start to grow food locally as much as possible.

Time to bring back the veggie patch.

A week of food riots has seen the Haitian Prime Minister fired by the Senate. Food is right up there on the National Security watch list along with climate change, peak oil and water. This has been simmering for a while now but is starting to loom as a serious global problem.

It’s not a problem that can be considered in isolation. Speculation in land (financial asset bubble), population growth, the bio-fuel issue and climate change have all contributed to a serious problem with the food chain.

Rising oil prices have just been the icing on this unpalatable cake. Is this likely to be contained to developing or poorer nations? Not so say some. In developed nations just-in-time delivery and stocking systems work on very tight margins. Food banks are under serious strain with a whole new layer of users appearing in recent times.

There’s no simple solution to this situation but governments need to take it very seriously.

I’ve mentioned Agflation previously and we’re starting to see more concern expressed at the official level. The UK Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser, Professor John Beddington, has weighed into the debate calling food shortages a problem that was as immediate as climate change. The driver of agflation is two fold: increased demand driven by population growth and increasing development and supply shortages caused by deforestation to grow biofuels.

These two drivers are causing major price rises in all food groups. This creates what might be called “real” inflation, a price rise in the cost of real goods as opposed to asset inflation which is more of a monetary phenomenon.

This is a real problem because it can’t be solved by the hammer of monetary policy though the myopists in their central bank ivory towers seem to think so.

I can imagine their conversation: “let’s raise interest rates so people eat less”.

In many countries people are exhorted to have more children especially in developed economies where birth rates among the middle classes have fallen. So how can we stop the population expanding and how are we going to feed all these people and do it in a manner than the ecosystem can cope with.

It’s a tricky question. One could argue that food shortages, famine, disease and natural disasters regulate populations. That may still be the case. But can we rely on that and should we given we are more enlightened, well supposedly.

Population growth was for a long time a favourite topic for policymakers but has only recently come back onto the mainstream agenda. There is no doubt that the growth in biofuels has played a major part in this and that governments who have set targets for biofuel supply may well need to go back and think more carefully about how the unintended consequences of this feel good policy will play out.

I came across this humdinger of a letter to Hillary Clinton at the Celsias site. Whilst it could be regarded as some kind of political stunt it does raise serious issues about the nature of our globalised food chain.

I have never been a fan of Monsanto and there despicable deeds have been well recorded. But as we have seen with the impact of biofuels, the whole food production process is changing and judging from the price increases not for the betterment of consumers. A new term has been coined: Agflation

In New Zealand we are seeing the benefits and costs of food price rises. Our diary farmers are raking it in but consumers are suffering. But consumers are taking action; they are eating less meat and dairy; they are reinstating the veggie patch and being more circumspect about their shopping habits.

This brings several benefits: healthwise less meat and dairy is generally good for you; growing your own veggies creates a sense of self-sufficiency, gets you in touch with nature and you get to eat really fresh food; there is a greater focus on food and what you eat with many people finding it cheaper to avoid processed food and make your own from scratch.

Isn’t that what many activists have been calling for for a long time? And the reason that this is happening? The price mechanism.

People respond to price signals. And when the respond they can be very smart about it. There’s a lesson in here for the bureaucrats and activists.

Let’s hope they find it

Finally some research has been done on the effects of bio-fuel crops on the ecosystem. As widely expected the research has shown that bio-fuels can be highly destructive on the environment as well as actually adding carbon into the atmosphere.

So much for being the replacement to fossil fuels.

This a prime example of doing something because it looks like the right or a good thing to be doing. Those people with prescriptive views on how we should live our lives rarely take the trouble to do the sums and that’s where the problem arises.

Until we start to price up environmental externalities and let them flow through the price mechanism we will not get to see the true cost. So we will keep doing things because they feel good to us or they remove some embedded guilt about the way we use the environment.

The market is working in an inefficient manner and the environment continues to suffer because of it. Many environmentalists have a big grudge against the market perceiving it to be a monstrous creation of the capitalist machine. They are sadly mistaken. The market is how we show the real value of the environment to everyone not just those who think humans are a stain upon it.

Now I don’t want to tar all bio-fuels with the same brush. Bio-diesel from algae for example is using a waste stream and an easily grown input. Large swathes of forest don’t need to be cut down for this process.

But until we see the costs flow through the system we just don’t know.