We are starting to hear more overt language from both officials and the general media about the potential for currency way, namely competitive devaluations, capital controls and other measures to shift currencies to where they should be or where officials would like them to be. Sovereign states have always messed with their currencies whether to screw their own people or other nations. It’s always about self-interest. But at some point the beggar they neighbour approach fails and we race to the bottom. There is no doubt that China is the key here but it’s played a very smart hand and has the US over a barrel. The geo-political arm wrestle is at full bore here and we don’t get to see much of it in the news. At some point though the surplus nations must adjust their currencies to bring the trading world back into equilibrium otherwise the whole system will fall apart. Keynes predicted this would happen and its been a 70 year work in progress. Kondratiev would be impressed.

The question is why hasn’t that happened already. You would imagine that a country with a trade deficit and an ongoing current account deficit (swollen by interest on borrowings to cover the trade deficit) would see its currency weaken and surplus countries would see the opposite. THis change in currency rates would, other things being equal, reverse the flow of trade and all would be rebalanced. On paper maybe but in the real “free market” that doesn’t happen. Why? Because deficit countries tend to have higher interest rates (in order to attract the capital it needs to pay off its debts) and those higher yields attract more and more capital looking for a home. So we have the ludicrous situation of one country lending another country the money to buy its goods…….that is not a recipe for long term success….unless you happen to be running a criminal organisation where your goal is to get your clients hooked on the product…..

It’s also known as debt slavery. And it must stop.

So does this mean we are headed for a new Plaza/Louvre Accord? I think that will be very difficult to achieve at the moment. It’s unlikely the Chinese would accept a single focus on the Yuan. It would almost be better to completely realign the whole global currency system where all surplus/deficit currency rates were realigned to new levels. The obvious problem (other than agreeing new rates) is that there would be nothing to stop markets moving rates right back. This suggests capital controls may come into play (Brazil is already trying something here with its bond market) perhaps in the manner of Malaysia.

More over steps such as currency intervention can be a problem unless the stars are aligned in your favour. Trying to weaken a surplus currency is next to impossible as the SNB found to their chagrin when buying huge amounts of Eur/Chf at a time when the market was actually desperate for Chf. The Japanese are repeating the same mistake as the Swiss by intervening, cutting rates, increasing liquidity and generally flapping about in the Yen. At this point in time they have made no progress at all. Why? Because the market wants to own surplus currencies and not the $. At some point $/Yen will collapse which will suit the US though probably not the Japanese.

For deficit countries with an appreciating and overvalued currency like New Zealand there may be better opportunities for influence. More on that net time.

For now though begun the currency wars have.

I guess we can call this Basel III or maybe a souped up Basel II. Who knows? When you have an inherently unstable system any new plan for control is likely to end up in the round filing cabinet before it has a chance to be implemented.

But one thing is clear from the latest global pow-wow: monetary stimulus will remain in place for some time as extra tightening through higher capital requirements sucks in more capital. With all the talk of recovering economies and poistive GDP reads in some countries, it is easy to forget the amount of wealth that has been sucked into the black hole of balance sheet never never land.

Who would be a bean counter these days?

It reminds me of the time I was working on the ticket sales operation for the Brisbane Expo back in 1988. It was a $60m take and I was drafted in to make the numbers balance. It was a lot of fun and eventually I got to the point where I had accounted for everything but there was still a pesky $110 I couldn’t reconcile. It simply didn’t make any sense to me but in the end I just gave up and figured it didn’t matter that much.

Now the numbers seem a bit larger when it comes to bank meltdowns. We have a long way to go before we actually can understand where the money has gone, who owes it, who lost it and what the actual impact on the supply of money is.

So in this case G20 are spot on. Deflationary forces abound. I have no worry about inflation at all. Sure we will keep seeing short term rebounds in some statistics and small sighs of relief. Let’s face it, the markets ahve had an enormous rally in the last 6 months. But do they reflect the underlying reality? Nope.

That’s because the crevasses have been papered over with huge swathes of new paper. But underneath they lie there waiting for some poor fool to fall in again. Slowly it feels like the bankers are starting to understand that they let credit growth go bananas and that their carefully constructed inflation numbers didn’t always tell the truth about asset prices.

We still have major systemic problems to deal with. Tightening credit will cause severe pain but low rates will help ease some of that. But catching the tiger by the tail is the only way forward.

Just watching Bush, Sarko and some other bureaucrat from the EU announcing the coming of the new order or is it a new new order. Forget Black Monday its all Blue from here.

Actually they are right. Bretton Woods created US dominance in financial matters to go along with their dominance in military affairs. Whilst Keynes argued for a system of balanced trade the US saw an opportunity to sell the world US$ which they could print for nothing. The seignorage accruing to the US has been the backbone of their economy for 60 years and those holders of US$ and US paper must be wondering how they got sucked in so badly.

I enjoyed Sarkozy saying everyone would be part of developing a solution…..it’s amusing to watch Bush and Sarkozy together. The clash of cultures is stark and it will be interesting to see how this global summit develops and more importantly who gets to set the agenda.

One thing is for sure: leverage is history. The financial markets will shrink and exotic products will become a relic of a distant past. It will be back to basics like borrowing to create and produce rather than borrowing to invest in a synthetic financial product. The fall out from the contraction of the financial markets will be severe. Unemployment will rise not just in the financial industry itself but in all the industries that service it. Asset values will fall. How can property prices rise when the supply of money is contracting?

Of course the one issue I am looking to see on the table is who creates the supply of money: will it be banks once again creating loans deposits at will or will it be sovereign nations supplying money into the banking system to be lent out or supplying it direct to citizens as a basic income.

This is the crucial issue.

Will the sovereign right of Parliament be reasserted for the first time in over 300 years? No one remembers William of Orange but in 1685 his overthrow of the Stuarts, aided by European bankers, laid the foundations of modern banking.He gave away Parliament’s right to create money and placed it in the hands of the bankers.

Plus ca change.

But the time of change is upon us.

The global banking system has now been underwritten, guaranteed and in some cases nationalised completely. There is no surprise in that course of action as it was all they could do. Whether they take stakes in, takeover or buy preferred stock makes no difference. Now they have bought some time we will have to wait and see how it pans out. The underlying problem remains the same though.

They have not addressed the difference between money and credit.

Money is what the sovereign authority issues. This carries no interest burden which is a future claim on goods and services yet to be produced i.e. drives the growth imperative.

Credit is what banks issue based on deposits and “other types of capital” that are in the bank. This carries interest. Credit makes up 97% of the money supply. Credit is treated as money although laws are very clear that only sovereign authorities can create money.

Confused?

There is a strong argument to say that bank credit is fraudulent money. I digress.

Instead of supporting the credit creation system we need to support the money creation system. It’s that simple. Let me be clear: banks do not lend out your deposits. They use your deposits as collateral on new loans.

Take Kiva, my favorite microfinance outfit: I deposit $25, find a borrower and lend them the money. My $25 is gone and i have to wait for it to be repaid. That is true lending. Think of it as investment.

Bank lending is garbage.

The answer is to nationalise the supply of money and remove the interest burden at the point of creation. I think this is likely to happen at some point as governments run into difficulties with their guarantee schemes.

We will need a new monetary authority who will issue new money into the economy and monitor the supply of money in the economy at any given time.

Only then will we be able to build a genuinely productive and healthy society and economy.

12 October 2008

OPERATIONAL DETAILS

New Zealand Deposit Guarantee Scheme

This document outlines the key characteristics of the deposit guarantee scheme announced by the Minister of Finance this afternoon.  Draft contracts containing the full details of the guarantee will be available on the Reserve Bank’s website later this evening.

The Offer
Under the terms of the Public Finance Act, the Crown will invite eligible institutions to enter a guarantee of their deposit liabilities. Eligible financial institutions, will be New Zealand registered banks and non bank deposit-taking financial institutions, who are fully compliant with the requirements of their trust deeds.

The decision to enter a guarantee with any specific institution, whether now or in the future, will be at the sole discretion of the Crown.

Which deposits will be covered?
For New Zealand incorporated registered banks deposits from both residents or
non-residents, will be covered.

For non bank deposit takers and for the unincorporated branches of overseas entities only deposits of New Zealand citizens and New Zealand tax residents will be covered.

Deposit liabilities will be covered regardless of the currency in which they are denominated.

Deposits and other liabilities owed to financial institutions, whether in NZ or offshore, are explicitly excluded from this guarantee.

How long will the guarantee last?
The guarantee will be offered for a term of two years.

Fees
The government will charge a fee for any guarantee offered on amounts in excess of $5 billion.

For covered liabilities in excess of $5 billion a fee of 10 basis points per anum will be charged for the guarantee.  The fee will be charged on the basis of the total covered liabilities, in excess of $5 billion of the institution.

What will trigger the exercise of the guarantee?
The Crown will make payment in the event of the liquidation of a guaranteed financial institution, if its assets are shown to be insufficient to meet the liabilities covered by this guarantee.

Administration
These guarantees will be offered and administered by the Treasury.

Further Information
For institutions wanting further information on their eligibility for this guarantee please contact the Reserve Bank on: 021 682 757.

________________________________________

DEPOSIT GUARANTEE SCHEME

Q & A

12 October 2008

What is a deposit guarantee scheme?

It is a facility where the Crown guarantees people who have deposits with institutions in the scheme.  It covers all retail deposits of participating New Zealand-registered banks, and retail deposits by locals in non-bank deposit-taking entities. This would include building societies, credit unions and deposit-taking finance companies.

It only covers deposits and other debt securities.

What is “retail”?

Deposits by anyone other than financial institutions (eg banks and non-bank deposit-takers themselves)

What will it cost?

The scheme will be free for institutions with total retail deposits under $5 billion.  A fee of ten basis points per annum will be charged on total deposits above $5 billion. This means that a bank with $20 billion in retail deposits would pay $15 million in fees per annum.

There is no direct fee for individuals, but institutions will determine if and how the costs of the scheme are passed on

What is the cost to the Crown?

This obviously depends on the degree (if any) to which it is drawn on (like any insurance scheme).  Any guarantees will be recorded as
unquantified, contingent liabilities of the Crown.

Why was the facility announced this afternoon? What precipitated it?

The government has moved today to ensure ongoing depositer confidence in
New Zealand given the international financial market turbulence.   The
New Zealand banking system remains sound.  This move is to give further assurance to New Zealanders that their deposits are safe.  It follows other measures that have been undertaken by the Reserve Bank in recent weeks to ensure the liquidity of the banking system.

Why has this been done without legislation?

Parliament is not sitting, and therefore legislation can’t be introduced.  However, the Minister has powers under the Public Finance Act to act in this way.

Does this apply to non-banks / finance companies?

Yes it does, inasmuch as they meet the criteria (above).  Customers should check with their institution to confirm whether they are going to seek cover.

It does not apply retrospectively.

What about non-residents?

For branches of overseas banks and non-bank deposit-takers, non-residents will not be covered.

Is this scheme comparable with the facility announced in Australia
today?   What about other jurisdictions?

From what we’ve seen, the schemes are different – but both are aimed at encouraging confidence

Where can I go for more information?

Individual customers should talk with their banks or non-bank institutions.

There’s no point playing the blame game. It’s all about what we do now.

Although G7 and the IMF have gone to full battle stations the reality is the die is cast. Markets have crashed, liquidity has disappeared, credit is history and the revaluation and squaring up of positions has to somehow be undertaken.

The margin calls will be coming thick and fast next week. The derivatives nightmare is a beast matched only by the legendary Hydra. Each cut brings forth two new disasters.

The choices facing policymakers are stark and , for them, almost unbelievable.

- Public interest free money will need to be pumped into the system. Not to cover debts but to provide a boost to a money supply which is disintegrating as loans are written off. This should not be a bank bailout but a reconstitution of a money supply from the public. Banking for now is suspended and banks are likely to be worth very little unless they are very well capitalised and have little exposure to falling asset prices. Bank deposits will be uncondtionally guaranteed under this approach.

- Stock markets: Next week will see a wave of selling that can only be described as a death spiral. It is hard to see any approach other than freezing all global stock markets. The alternative is for governments to start buying stocks i.e. nationalisation of business. That would be a very big call but is possible.

_ Currencies: There are potentially very crazy moves ahead. Deficit countries will see huge sell offs so some kind of coordinated intervention will be needed here. It may not be physical but more a guarantee between creditor and debtor nations to maintain current levels.

This is going to be a momentous week. Let’s hope policymakers are up to the task .

Either way

It’s dolling out cash like sweets at a birthday party. Where is it all coming from?

Last week bank borrowing from the Fed reached an average of $188bln a day!!

All the primary dealers (all 3 of them GS, MS and ML) were in at their teat, the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, for over $100bln.

This is the stuff of legend.

Parker Brothers will be rushing out new Monopoly sets soon with an extra 6 zeros added.

To say the banking system is on life support would be an understatement. Its actually getting CPR……one billion, 2 billion, 3 billion…………

Even the Fed must run out of cash at some point.

Sure the Treasury can sell more paper….but whoa……who is going to keep funding the US Treasury in order to buy toxic paper from the banks?

Who will bail out the Fed?

Let’s be clear about this: it isn’t going to work. Nothing less than a full recapitalisation of affected banks and financial insitutions will suffice. Repackaging bad debts has been tried already.

What should happen is a debt for equity approach. As it stands now equity holders have (and should be) absolutely wiped out. They have done their dough.

But the real sticking point is all those bondholders. Bonds rank ahead of equity in a liquidation but to avoid that bond holders would swap debt for equity: yes its a disaster scenario but it allows balance sheets to be reformatted (esssentially this is a reformatting of numbers on a spreadsheet).

Given the leverage in debt markets the value of the equity will be piddly but there is not a lot of choice.

There is no one taxpayers should be bailing out failed institutions.

The only solution for taxpayer involvement is complete nationalisation of failing institutions without any fancy deals.

The half way both up approach will not make anyone happy and merely patch up a badly flawed system.

Though the products have changed the mantra hasn’t: Greed is Good.

Greed as an incentive to productivity? I don’t think so. Look at the innovation coming out of the technology world and compare it with the innovation coming out of the financial world. Technology is founded on the idea of making life easier, efficient and fun. Innovation in finance is a way of slicing and dicing the same piece of paper.

But what’s the paper made of? Not much really as we are finding out.

The investment banks that rolled out of the 80s and dominated the global financial landscape are falling like dominoes. Falling on the back of injudicious management of risk, capital and balance sheets.

But that’s not where the rot really starts. Greed is just another human emotion, another desire. Living in a world with few boundaries it should come as no shock that we have tipped over into the abyss.

The money seems to have been flowing like the pump was turned on full steam, an inexhaustable supply of cash to be invested in anything that moved or, in the case of property, did nothing.

Now the party is well and truly over. After numerous attempts to keep it going by the self proclaimed master, Alan Greenspan, no one can take anymore. Its like turning up to a mad all day party at 4am with another case of wine or keg of beer. It has no value. Everyone is asleep, passed out.

It will take a while to play out. Some more institutions will go under probably in the form of a shotgun merger, a hastily arranged monetary marriage with glum faces standing behind the bride and groom attempting to be happy.

Just last night the FSA in the UK talked about how “well capitalised” HBOS was. At the same time they were forced into a “merger” with Lloyds. Oliver Stone couldn’t make this up if he was on acid.

But looking ahead can we find anything in the rubble to work with? Well maybe.

It’s time for a reform of the banking system, root and branch.

Banks can go back to being deposit takers and loan makers (though I think P2P lending will eventually take this over).

A Parliamentary institution can take over the task of supply money to the economic system via a Universal Basic Income and Direct expenditure. This would be managed with excrutiating process and targets.

Not like our current Central Bankers who have given up on targetting inflation: one because they can’t get it to work and two because they are more worried about the impact on financial markets.

It doesn’t work. The current system promotes inflation, falling real wages and the treatment of money as a financial asset.

So when we see the reaction to Parliamentary control of the money supply we can simply point out the failures of the private system for all to see.