Fed throws huge Hail Mary……..

Another day, another bail out but this time they have thrown the play book out the window.

It feels like a 4th down with 80m to go and 10 seconds on the clock.

Game over.

Wrap up the toxic stuff (we’ve heard that before) and hopefully it will all go away. Strange that Goldmans have been spared the ignominy of going under as Paulson comes in to the rescue. Anyone wondering about the Goldmans cabal at the centre of a government that always yells out “we had no choice” will be muttering feverishly about the intervention on Friday.

Forget about whether the US should lose its AAA rating or the $ be heaved off the cliff, what concerns me is the idea that ex-market players are running the public finances. Why not let all the banks fail? If that’s the outcome of the “free market” then let it happen. As long as depositors money is safe the rest is a simple case of caveat emptor.

The taxpayer is picking up the bill so why not pay as little as possible.

And what then you ask? Well the banking system will be nationalised to a point, focused in the issuance of money as opposed to making loans. The point is that there are elements of our financial system that we could well do without.

They said the Titanic was unsinkable.

Goodbye Gordon Gekko

Who could forget the electrifying performance of Michael Douglas in “Wall Street” a film that still smolders in the consciousness as reflecting the canvas that is the financial market.

Though the products have changed the mantra hasn’t: Greed is Good.

Greed as an incentive to productivity? I don’t think so. Look at the innovation coming out of the technology world and compare it with the innovation coming out of the financial world. Technology is founded on the idea of making life easier, efficient and fun. Innovation in finance is a way of slicing and dicing the same piece of paper.

But what’s the paper made of? Not much really as we are finding out.

The investment banks that rolled out of the 80s and dominated the global financial landscape are falling like dominoes. Falling on the back of injudicious management of risk, capital and balance sheets.

But that’s not where the rot really starts. Greed is just another human emotion, another desire. Living in a world with few boundaries it should come as no shock that we have tipped over into the abyss.

The money seems to have been flowing like the pump was turned on full steam, an inexhaustable supply of cash to be invested in anything that moved or, in the case of property, did nothing.

Now the party is well and truly over. After numerous attempts to keep it going by the self proclaimed master, Alan Greenspan, no one can take anymore. Its like turning up to a mad all day party at 4am with another case of wine or keg of beer. It has no value. Everyone is asleep, passed out.

It will take a while to play out. Some more institutions will go under probably in the form of a shotgun merger, a hastily arranged monetary marriage with glum faces standing behind the bride and groom attempting to be happy.

Just last night the FSA in the UK talked about how “well capitalised” HBOS was. At the same time they were forced into a “merger” with Lloyds. Oliver Stone couldn’t make this up if he was on acid.

But looking ahead can we find anything in the rubble to work with? Well maybe.

It’s time for a reform of the banking system, root and branch.

Banks can go back to being deposit takers and loan makers (though I think P2P lending will eventually take this over).

A Parliamentary institution can take over the task of supply money to the economic system via a Universal Basic Income and Direct expenditure. This would be managed with excrutiating process and targets.

Not like our current Central Bankers who have given up on targetting inflation: one because they can’t get it to work and two because they are more worried about the impact on financial markets.

It doesn’t work. The current system promotes inflation, falling real wages and the treatment of money as a financial asset.

So when we see the reaction to Parliamentary control of the money supply we can simply point out the failures of the private system for all to see.

Game over for the Fed

6 months ago I summarised the status of the US banking system finishing with the line “the financial system on the verge of complete collapse”.

I haven’t added much recently because there was no need. It’s like watching a train wreck in slow motion: you stand there with yoru mouth wide open unable to speak as you take in the enormity of the action in front of you.

What’s left to say? The banking system is effectively nationalised but we knew that with Northern Rock. The difference between Lehmans and Bear Stearns was simply timing. BS was first in the queue and so got some help. By the time Lehmans (who I once worked for) came around no one wanted to touch it and given that they didn’t have customer deposits they could be allowed to fail. Mind you I see Barclays already snapping up some units in the US.

Now we have AIG, a private company, but an insurer so therefore a pretty important spoke the the wheel of the economy. $80bln…..the Fed’s printing press must be running to breaking point. Anyone keeping count of all this?

Don’t bother.

The US debt position is in La-La Land.

This move on AIG is dangerous. Not only has the banking system been nationalised but the stock market is being underwritten. Why the S+P isn’t at 1000 is beyond me. This artificial support of the stock market is just as crazy.

The Fed worries about adding “to substantially higher borrowing costs, reduced household wealth and materially weaker economic performance”. Well that’s fair enough but that is the reality. The US has overextended itself over the last 8 years with cheap credit and massive leverage through financial intermediaries.

It’s over. The Fed should be over too.

The authorities need to take a cold hard look at the financial system and the disaster it has wreaked.

No clearer evidence of this has been the advancement into positions of political power by ex-investment bankers particularly from Goldmans. The leverage game must surely be over now.

We are watching the end of 20 years of US financial domination through global investment banking. The end of financial assets being marketed as investments and hopefully a complete reorganisation of the banking and financial system onto a sounder and more stable position, once which encourages productive endeavour and not constant speculation.

PPPs….no,non,nyet.

Private Public Partnerships are back on the agenda as the New Zealand Election approaches once again. National is proposing them and Labour denouncing them. For once I actually agree with Michael Cullen though probably our reasons are somewhat different.

First of all I think infrastructure is incredibly important. Imagine if we had free broadband covering the whole of NZ. Imagine a computer in every household. Decent and reliable energy and school facilities our children require to get them on track to become productive adults.

Of course we need decent roads, hospitals and schools. I think National has a bit more vision in this area. It realises that we need to seriously invest and not in extra layers of bureacracy but in high impact areas like teachers, classrooms, sports and leisure facilities and technology.

It’s the PPP bit that I don’t like because what normally happens is that the Public bit gets loaded with debt and the overall cost of the project spirals out of control. Private investors want iron clad punts with very good paper returns. The Public wants quality common good assets for the public use. I think road tolls can be useful if a road supplies a benefit to a small group of users but in general we need to create long lasting infrastructure that ultimately benefit all.

It’s easy to split hairs over the financing and benefit aspects of building public assets but i’d bring the axe right down and say that we can fund these projects interest free.

Yes that’s right. Interest free. There’s a proviso, well maybe a couple:

One: The asset must be clearly adding the the public good. Broadband comes into this category as do schools and healthcare (though that is a greyish area).

Two: the money supply needs to be better managed.

The proposal is simply that government can create the money interest free, metaphorically speaking by printing it. The money comes into the system and is used to create the asset. The money can be paid back or not depending on the asset.

What? i hear you say. Isn’t that inflationary? Ceteris paribus yes but see proviso 2. The main issue is that interest will not be required so no new money needs to be created in order to pay back the interest. All you monetary scholars will alread know that interest is money that does not yet exist in the system and so has to be created via new money, normally in the form of debt.

The Forum for Stable Currencies in the UK has been advocating this policy for 6 years now through a string of Early Day Motions in Parliament. These have been kindly sponsored by Austin Mitchell, an MP well know to New Zealanders.

The point here is to dispell the myth that we are dependent on banks and overseas financiers to create our own public assets. That is a conversation I would love to see John Key and Michael Cullen have.

New Zealand: Still are Warriors

I caught up with an old friend in London recently and he mentioned Once Were Warriors, the New Zealand film, as still being seared in his consciousness. His comment has been reinforced since I got back to NZ with the revelations of Tony Veitch and his violent assault on his previous partner.

Violence never seems far from the front pages over here. Whether it’s child abuse, domestic assault, late night bashings or just some good old biffo on the sports pitch, the modus operandi is the same: fists. Is Jake the Muss the deeply ingrained dark side of the NZ male? That’s not to present the UK as a country that doesn’t experience violence on a regular basis. It’s hard to remember a month in recent years where a teenager hasn’t been knifed to death.

The rise in violent crime in London was certainly one reason to move to NZ.

But there are differences. The two Deborah’s raise the issues of violence and anti-intellectualism as being embedded in NZ society. Deborah Coddington laments the violent culture that pervades this “Godless country” noting the desire to hand out “loving smacks” as an inviolate right. If one casts back a year and remembers the furore at the introduction of an “anti smacking” law here. The energy going into a repeal of this law is quite impressive. Regardless of the merits of the new law it is the desire to be allowed to hit that, for me at least, reflects a desire to sort matters out with brawn rather than brains.

This follows neatly onto Deborah Hill Cone’s piece on Jim Bolger and his new appointment as the “Fat Controller” for Kiwirail (will all the trains be black?). As she notes

“The only conclusion to draw is New Zealand’s anti-intellectualism is so acute we really feel most comfortable being governed by thick people or bullies”.

This point was reinforced by Robert Winston on his recent trip to NZ where he noted that cleverness was not valued. He also noted we are exporting our talented people in droves and under investing in research and education.

New Zealand is in some ways still primitive. We rely on our primary industries for the bulk of our economic performance. Perhaps that is still reflected in our base culture. Perhaps that is why the Auckland rugby league team was named “The Warriors”. Talk about embedding the brand!

The way the news is presented on TV One sometimes seems an extension of that silly programme “A Game of Two Halves” which makes “A Question of Sport” look like “University Challenge”. That the man in question is involved in both probably reflects the current malaise. On top of that the jocularity of the presenters leaves one to wonder whether it is the news or some mates gathering.

This story wont go away. At some point the violence, and its seeming acceptance, has to be addressed at a wider level.

Not all Euros are the same

I had heard that some Euros were better than others and this story confirms the rumours.

Germans are refuisng to accept Euros which have originated from the Latin Bloc, especially Italy. They want “hard” Euros issued by the almighty Bundesbank, that inflation fighting automaton. You can hardly blame them given the fiscal history of Italy, never mind Greece, Spain or Portugal.

But what this shows is the lengths to which people will go to mitigate risk. It seems a waste of time really given that the Euro is universal in its value and acceptance. But its a bit like English and Scottish Pounds. No one ever wanted a Scottish one even though they were both accepted as legal tender by the Bank of England.

Perception is everything and the Germans have long memories of inflationary times.

The sad fact is that if the financial system falls apart nothing will save you. Having a nice pile of gold soveriegns might but the reality is that there wouldn’t be enough to create a reasonable market for exchange. Now a nice veggie garden is more of a goer in times of monetary distress. This is where NZ has a major comparative advantage. Nearly everyone has a patch of dirt in which to grow stuff.

Our central banks have a lot to answer for but promoting home grown veggies is one good thing to come out of this debacle.