Credit Boom ……..Busts

The credit inspired boom of the last 15 years is now over. Markets are in severe dislocation and whilst underlying economies are very sound there is a serious problem in global banking liquidity.

On the good side we have record low unemployment and company profits are in good shape. But the driver of that has been consumption driven by an expanding money supply which has driven up asset prices and created a wave of paper wealth.

Interest rates have been hiked up to halt this boom. It’s too late. The record low rates in the US over the last 5 years created easy money that was too good to refuse. As rates were jacked up people realised they hadn’t done their sums properly.

Wave after wave of derivative offers, capital guaranteed notes and other “too good to be true” offers have come pouring forth. There is nothing so easy as making money out of money.

But mathematics will always intervene. Compound interest takes no prisoners in its tsunami like advance across personal and corporate balance sheets.

The central banks now have no option but to step in and sort this mess out. The risk of systemic crash is clearly a possibility now, not just in stock markets but banking systems.

Whether markets can recover from here is a moot point. They always do eventually whether its months or years.

If the consumer goes to sleep expect a recession plain and simple. It wont matter where you are or what you do.

The important point is that our financial systems need a serious revamp. The gross expansion of the global money supply, condoned by the global central banks, needs a full inquiry.

Nothing less will do.

The Great Lolly Scramble

For those not in New Zealand a lolly scramble comes at the end of the party when you throw heaps of sweets amongst the children and watch them go beserk. Of course once they have gorged themselves they fall in a heap as the sugar high follows by a big crash.

What we are seeing in the global markets is nothing short of a major fiasco. Banks wont lend to each other so the central banks have flooded the market with cash.

Come and get it they say. This is now starting to get silly.  They were at it again last night as well. When is it going to end?

Goldman Sachs came in with a $3bln bailout for a fund last night as well talking the deal up as a winner. Well of course there will always be distressed sellers in a credit crunch. We’ve seen it here in New Zealand with finance companies going bust with alarming regularity over the last couple of years.

The problem is that we haven’t even started to see the real pain. The real economy is quite strong globally as the spin offs from the asset price boom feeds through in consumption. But how long is that going to last. In New Zealand we are seeing housing activity level off and prices come off the top. Today we saw weak retail sales.

What I observe here is that many properties remain unsold as people will not take lower prices. This is not reflected in the data. Many properties are withdrawn unsold or just sit around in the hope some mug will pay up for them.

So at the moment we are in the distressed phase of the market sell down. People who have to sell must sell and we are starting to see that. The question is whether it slowly spirals out in the main market. We are clearly at a turning point in the economic cycle. Years of asset price increases, consumption driven higher on the back of that wealth effect, central banks with no control over the money supply, late to raise rates, now hammering rates rises home as prices peak, people locked in at high prices and high rates, wages and labour very tight………it’s a recipe for recession.

This is why the central bankers are still talking tough on inflation. They don’t want to start talking in worrying terms in case they “cause” a slowdown.

So expect the lolly scramble to continue.

But there will be a price to pay afterwards.

Global Markets: The Dragon stirs

The ongoing spat between the US and China over the rate of yuan appreciation has boiled over into something more interesting.

Last night Chinese officials threatened the possibility of selling down their US treasury holdings and thereby consigning the US$ to the trashcan. The Chinese are experts at promoting the maxim “don’t throw stones in glasshouses”. They are very astute at pointing out inconsistencies in arguments no doubt employing age old Confucian wisdom.

How the relationship between China and the US will pan out is anyone’s guess but we can be clear about one thing and that is the balance of power has shifted ever so slightly. The phenomenal success of the Chinese economy, based mostly on a large manufacturing base, has given the Chinese are strong foothold in global affairs. Whereas once it was a sleeping dragon content to rule its own domain now it is a major player.

At the same time it has built a strong domestic economy and plays host to the Olympics next year. It seems the US may need China more than China needs the US.

The situation doesn’t look too good for the US. Collapsing credit markets need a steady government security base to hold it all together. Any sell of in the US Treasury market would be a real disaster sending stocks down as well as the dollar.

To some extent we’ve been through this before with the Japanese. In the mid 90s Fred Bergsten hit the headlines calling for a stronger yen. This caused the $ to fall to a record low of 79.65. He was still making this call back in 2002 when he outlined strong reasons for abandoning the Clinton “strong dollar” policy.

This delicate game was fictionalised by Tom Clancy in his book “Debt of Honour” which told of a plot to destabilise the US economy by crashing the Treasury markets and the $. Of course the US won in the end but in real life who knows what would happen. The US authorities run some major interference in the markets when required and i am sure that any severe destabilisation of financial markets would see national security considerations apply (well if they haven’t got that sorted they should!). Sadly many of Clancys’ novels end up happening in real life.

The Chinese are very tactical and astute in their political strategy and very protective of their sovereignty. It will be interesting to see how this plays out but more weakening of global markets cannot be ruled out and with the end of the credit fuelled asset price boom added into the mix cash will be king.

Freedom to be

We’ve just finished Freedom Week here in New Zealand, a campaign run by Amnesty International to raise money and awareness. Also MyAmnesty has been launched. Get online and participate.

Some 130 collectors braved the southerly on Friday to collect in Christchurch (yes i was one of them) so well done to all those and to those who donated and stopped for a chat.

Without basic freedom we have nothing. Freedom to be, to think, to speak, write, draw or blog!

Whatever your political persuasion it is hard to to look away from the constant abuses of personal security whether for reasons of censorship or war. It’s all the same.

We can’t have a functioning economy without personal security. We can’t have functioning communities without personal security and we most certainly cannot have a decent environment without personal security.

We wouldn’t be sitting here in the blogosphere expounding our thoughts and views on whatever we fancied.

We should be grateful for the life we have here in New Zealand. It’s pretty good.

Volatile Markets - par for the course

It’s been an interesting week or so since the RBNZ lifted interest rates t0 a wallet popping 8.25%. The Kiwi peaked above 81cts in a nice blow off move and post rate hike and carefully worded statement it has retraced as far at 75.5cts with the Yen cross taking a battering from 97.50 to 88.50. So much for safe carry trades.

The South Korean Finance Minister made some loud noises about the carry trade implications for the Won which was a bit firm for comfort.

Look really this is just a big game. And in all games there are winners and losers. As we see domestically in NZ with the collapse of yet another finance company, its usually the average risk averse investor who takes a cold bath.

Belgian dentists and Japanese housewives watch out!

All this because irresponsible and incompetent central bankers mismanage the global monetary system.

Leveraged money is like water….it will run down until it finds a place that can hold it. Anything that looks remotely fixed will attract attention..exchange rates, interest rates etc.

In a way speculators act in harmony with natural systems. Our world is in constant flux and it is normal for systems to move as new information is incorporated. Nowhere is this more obvious than the global currency markets…each breath of news is immediately received into the price no matter how minute.

So as soon as Alan Bollard said this is enough for now, then all bets were off and the market responded accordingly. Throw in the sub-prime meltdown in the US and it turned into a rout which could continue further. As i noted previously the Kiwi was at a level worth selling and could fall much further especially if the crosses get unwound.

We shouldn’t be overly concerned because we know the system is built to generate these crises every few years. According to Fred Harrison its every 18 years for the big bust  but currency debacles happen more regularly than that…..Asia, South America, Euro land, Russia…its par for the course.

So don’t be too alarmed. Just remember what Newton said…..whats goes up always comes down….eventually.

The True Cost of Energy

The energy debate continues to go in circles. Usually its starts with the renewable sector heavyweights: wind and solar. The free and usually reliable inputs of wind and sun are very attractive. The technology is improving and, in the case of solar energy, the transmission mechanism is close at hand.

One company in the US has actually started a rental program for solar heating. I like this idea because capital cost is a problem for many people. Energy as a service is a good business model.

Solar is a great option because you can localise it. Hopefully the technology will continue t to improve.

Wind has its drawbacks due to the requirements of location and serious land mass. But again it suits some places better than others. But how about small wind turbines on every roof?

Little and often i say. Every little bit counts.

Biomass is the latest technology on the block, a small step up from chucking wood in the burner which is very popular and cheap in New Zealand. We can grow a lot of wood down here. The biomass and biofuel solution reveal a problem in our approach.

It doesn’t have to be one or the other. It can be both/and. It’s clear now there is no one solution that is way better than another. Let the market continue to work it out. And this brings me to the main point which is that we must have a properly priced energy market.

This is going to require a major change. I have long banged on about pricing in environmental costs at source and whilst Trucost is doing great work in that area there is a long way to go.

So how could this work? Well here are a few examples:

Carbon

Let’s say we have established a price for “carbon”,this being a proxy for externalities caused in the combustion of fossil fuels. The most efficient way to alert the market to this cost is to price it in at source ie where the fossil fuel is sold wholesale. This would be the global oil, gas or coal exchanges.

In my paper, Climate Control, i argued for the establishment of a World Energy Agency, where all fossil fuels were sold through. Simply add on the price of carbon and leave it at that. As a one point global process it would be very simple and then that price information would flow out across the world. End of story.

But there are two issues here:

One is that we are trying to stop carbon quantities breaching certain levels. The price elasticity of fossil fuel consumption may hinder this somewhat as consumers of oil products are slow to change demand in response to price.

The second issue is interesting. What happens to that money? Who does it belong to? As a charge being levied by the WEA it has no soveriegn recipient. So i propose this “charge” goes into a Global Environmental Contingency Fund (GECF). I want to make clear this is not a tax, it is a cost. It is therefore directly related to an expense which is in this case the use or environmental services.

Let’s stop using the word tax. It’s incorrect and draws attention from the fact that we are simply paying for a service we are using.

So how could the GECF work? I have to give that some more thought but the rough idea is that it would hold those funds in bonds (sovereign) or could lend them out at low interest to fund projects that have a positive environmental benefit. This is the tricky bit. But let’s sit with the first piece. The money comes in and sits in bonds. That’s it. So it’s not being spent on projects of a dubious outcome. As the title implies its a Contingency Fund. We don’t know for sure what will happen in the future. The money can be repaid if required by discounting the price of fossil fuels if it turns out that the cost has turned out to be lower.

It’s a hard one to get right on  a global level but worth a look.

Agriculture

In New Zealand we have trouble with dairy farming, a highly profitable business which has seen huge swathes of land converted from other activities to supporting cows. The externalities of this business are numerous but center around water pollution through fertilizer run off into streams and down into the water table as well as cows crapping all over the place..oh yes and the methane burps.

Here it would be simpler. A charge would be applied per head of cattle and immediately be applied to cleaning up that pollution at source. Why should the taxpayer pick up this tab. Its a cost for the consumer to bear and if the consumer doesn’t like the slightly higher price then the producer will quickly alter his habits.

The moral of this  story is simple: We need to know the true cost of our global economic activity. Then as consumers we can respond appropriately.

Trying to say which energy source is better than another is simply guesswork.