Reverse Takeover: A Post-Imperial World?

I read today of Tata’s impending purchase of 2 of Ford’s great brands, Jaguar and Land Rover. Only last year Tata Steel paid $12bln for Anglo-Dutch steelmaker Corus. What’s going on here? What happened to the East India Company and all that? Queen Victoria would be spinning in her grave. It seems the plunder of Asia is over. And now it’s payback.

The Arabs are at it as well having bailed out Citibank not long ago and lets not forget the Chinese pumping in $5bln to keep Morgan Stanley afloat.

Those trade and petro dollars are finally being put to good use. The Arabs in the Emirates are showing their cousins the way foward by buying real assets instead of partying away the cash as they did in the 80s. The Chinese, always astute and long-term, are making obvious in roads into the US whilst continuing to make it hard the other way around.

Reverse colonialisation anyone?

The Ripple Effect - Money but not as you know it

The P2P lending sector is growing all the time with the main companies starting to increase custom and size. The rise of P2P lending is helping bring money and its nature into the wider consciousness. Alongside this sits other proposals for fully distributed money systems. Many of these revolve around traditional and tested complimentary currencies such as LETS, Time$ and other locally based systems.

One proposal is Ripple. It’s been around for a few years and there is some good information on the site including the initial paper from Ryan which I have posted up in the research section. There’s plenty of commentary around about it which is worth a look at. Essentially it proposes to replace bank created debt money with personally created credit through a fully distributed network based system. What is good about this proposal is that it takes the concept of local currency systems to its logical conclusion which is a globally based one with servers finding the right path to the appropriate relationship or network.

The most important part of this is identifying that most of what we think of as money is in fact simply an IOU. So why should banks create this? Well the main reason is trust. What Ripple proposes is the creation of that trust through networks, which as we know are already widely in use.

Jamesey proposes a further layer on top of this adding in microfinance structures and leveraging off the Paypal system.

We also have very well embedded and established credit card systems (Amex and Visa) who already have the distribution systems. So the trust system is going to be a key issue. Who is in your network? Who can you trust? I’d suggest and I hope that VortexDNA will play a role in helping this kind of global protocol to develop.

The main problem is the control of supply. One would like to think that a complex system, such as proposed, would regulate itself constantly adjusting to feedback. We know that the current system is close to imploding because of rampant money creation. So cculd it be any worse? Could governments participate also?

It’s open season and anything is possible.

The first run on the Bank of England

No not today but back in 1696. But its useful to just retell the story as it has laid the foundation for the development of industrial societies all over the world but primarily the UK and the USA.

When the Bank of England was formed in 1694 it was not as a government agency but a joint stockholder company who then lent money to the government to wage war. Money and war go hand in hand really….sound familiar?

But the deal was interesting. Coin, in the form of gold and silver, had to be deposited and then was lent at a rate of interest which at the time was 8%. This is where the term “gilt edged” comes from.

So far so good. But at the same time new money in the form of paper bills was issued against the same deposit of coin. Therefore at a stroke the amount of money as measured by coin and paper was doubled. The paper money was exchangeable for coin so in fact there was only enough coin for half the supply of money.

I’ve seen more complicated magic tricks at a children’s birthday party!

Needless to say some bright spark decided to up the ante somewhat and the first run took place. Over time this settled down so that 4 to 6 times the gold on reserve could be lent out as paper money. This paper money became known as “good as gold”. Quite clearly it wasn’t but it became accepted.

This was taken to extreme by the Farmers Exchange Bank from Rhode Island which was found to have issued banknotes to the tune of $580m backed up by metal reserves of just $3m (note to Les Hunter for that information).

It never hurts to check the balance sheet of your bank to see exactly how much it does have in the way of equity but as we saw in the UK recently it doesn’t really matter since its all guaranteed by the authorities anyway!

The People vs The Banks

News comes of a huge class action suit brought in Canada by a litigator called John Dempsey. Following on from John Kutyn’s (a Canadian living in NZ) paper “the Nature of Money” it takes the next step of actually calling banks to account under the law.

It’s being held up in the courts but at some point the suit must be acknowledged and heard. Its a tough one for the judges as they are being asked to rule on one of the most accepted practices in society today, namely the equivalence of “digital money” and cash in the form of notes and coins.

With the relentless advance of Peer to Peer lending systems coming online and complimentary currencies in every country it is easy to see how a major change is underway. Sure the banks may not be too concerned now but we are seeing the beginnings of a major revolution in what we know as money.

Fed readies for another cut as markets hit and hope

As the Fed prepares for another rate cut, probably 25bps, possibly 50, markets are resilient in the face of what is still a horrendous credit meltdown. With Merrill Lynch reporting a monumental loss last week, it is clear that banks are still clearing away the debris of the last few months and the real impact may not be felt for some time.

Never mind the jokes (you can’t bail out anything with a siv)around the Super SIVs: the great $100bln bailout plan hatched by some genius to support the market. Similar to the rescue plan post LTCM crash, it basically involved the market coming in to buy its own distressed assets. Liquidity is the mantra but holding up the market is the reality.

Everything is under water so its a game of smoke and mirrors. As I’ve said before its a rational response to a difficult situation. The social impact of a complete financial crash is not something anyone wants to see but the longer we put off the necessary surgery the worse it will be.

The credit bubble of the last 15 years is over. The balloon has too many holes in it and its a waste of time pumping more air into it.  Satayjit Das, author of Traders, Guns and Money lays it all out in this paper. Its worth a read.

The Power of Giving

Giving is in the news a lot recently especially with the publication of Bill Clinton’s book, Giving. I’ve mentioned previously that i  am a big fan of Kiva and today some of my first loans were repaid. So far i’ve made 15 and 4 have repaid all ahead of time which is great.

So with new money available to re lend i searched out some new potential borrowers but could only lend $25 at a time and then just two loans in total. Why?

Because Kiva is so overwhelmed with support that there are not enough businesses to lend to. They want to make sure as many people as possible get to be involved.

That’s great news on all fronts.

Ultimately we are moving towards a point where money will be viewed more and more as energy, not to be stored up but to be spread around. P2P finance, as well as other forms of exchange, have the opportunity to subvert current systems because it is people led. Social capital via the web is being built at an astounding rate.

Giving  is just one way of building this social capital which will be so important to the success and prosperity of society.