Man the Pumps: Central Banks run up the white flag

With rumours continuing to circle around main street financial institutions in trouble, the Fed along with other central banks piled in another $200bln worth of liquidity in a vain hope to stem the tide. It certainly worked sparking a massive rally in the US market which was looking very weak indeed.

I wrote 6 weeks ago that the Fed would have no option other than to underwrite the whole financial system. This is exactly what they are doing. The worrying aspect of this approach is that it leads the market to depend on continuing liquidity to provide confidence and prevent what would be happening without intervention, namely a full scale rout with several institutions going under.

This creates extreme moral hazard. Even though many financial institutions have clearly acted irresponsibly and in some cases in other ways, they will not be allowed to fail unless a “deal” is worked out where they will be “acquired” quietly for a nominal sum and so the system stays solidly in place and the illusion is maintained.

F.William Engdahl lays out his thoughts on the origins of this mess. It’s focus is the US over the last 100 years and is interesting to read though he makes some strong accusations about the actions of certain people.  The extent to which small cliques have organised and run the financial system is open to questions but there is no doubt that the US prevailed at Bretton Woods on the strength of pure self-interest.

So what now? Well I would say more of the same. But gravity is a powerful force and its hard to imagine these markets not falling further and more de-leveraging taking place in credit and carry trades. I’ll discuss shortly what a new global currency system might look like because the current one is about to explode.

Money’s too tight to mention

As the credit crunch continues to spreads its woes my inbox is filling up with offers from NZ banks (all Australian owned by the way) to buy various types of debt with fabulous names:

- Perpetual non-cumulative preference shares

- Perpetual callable sub-ordinated bonds

All offering north of 10%. A no brainer for bank debt surely?

Well yes it is. Let’s face it if the bank goes belly up we’re all stuffed. How much is deposit insurance worth these days? Probably not much. But the reason behind this rush of issuance is more interesting.

Banks have plenty of cash on the books, known to us as our deposits, but recorded as unsecured liabilities in the bank’s balance sheet. Yes we are not really depositors but merely unsecured creditors.

So why do banks need to raise more debt or more to the point equity dressed up as debt? Well their balance sheets are under severe pressure and they need to meet the requirements laid out in Basel II which means they need more equity on the balance sheet in order to lend out all this cash.

This is not good news at all. It means banks are constantly trying to tidy up their financial position which is tenuous at best.

In the US mortgage backed bonds, normally AAA, are trading at their widest against US treasuries since 1986. There is some serious de-leveraging going on even in the most liquid and traditionally safe markets. This is a harbinger of further losses to come. Many players are now starting to realise that the financial system is in structural distress.

Suddenly owning a few dairy cows seems like a sensible investment.

Municipal Bonds: The Rating Game

Local cities and states have finally woken up to the way in which they are systematically fleeced by the rating agencies. Bill Lockye, the Californian Treasurer, is leading a campaign to change the way in which their bonds are rated.

Often they are rated poorly which then requires a nice fat insurance payment on top. This simply transfers more taxpayer funds to the financial sector.

Ok so it’s just another racket but what I like about this is the awakening from local financial institutions and the realisation that they can do things a bit differently.

What is to stop local governments from issuing their own bonds to their own people for local projects? Take that a step further and what’s to stop them from issuing their own local currency.

The current crisis is helping many people to see through some of the smoke and mirror charges imposed in the course of financial transactions and the system is becoming more transparent as “special purpose” structures and entities are revealed to be nothing more than methods to add on commissions and fees as many times as possible.

New Zealand: Financial tsunami unseen but felt

I’m trying hard not to overuse the word “tsunami” but it just fits so perfectly. It’s powerful but can’t be seen until its almost upon you but it can be felt. Witness the animals who headed for the hills before the Tsunami of Christmas 2004. Animals have a different vibration, a different level of energy and resonance which enable them to to be more fine tuned to natural disturbances. Humans have lost that ability, well most of us.

So it’s hard to realise what may be coming our way. Listen to the Westpac economists predicting more rate rises on the back on a very tight employment situation, burgeoning inflation and booming commodity prices. The Kiwi (NZ$) continues to surge forward to record highs against the US$ on the back of very high interest rates. So what is the problem.

Household debt is the major concern here, the fault line as it were. Stories today and from the past week lead me to believe serious problems are now emerging: The Joneses going under because of a slowing real estate market; a serious downturn in house prices where sales below the Registered Valuation (RV) are happening; people being kicked out of their homes; water shortages for farmers; a very strong currency; interest rates really starting to bite; banks having to go to the market to raise money to shore up balance sheets; layoffs on the increase and business confidence sinking.

Yet commodity prices continue to rise: oil, food and metals.

It’s not a pretty sight. What’s a central banker to do? Raise interest rates to squash inflation? Of course they will but maybe if they take their heads out of their discredited forecasting models they may realise that actually people are being squeezed left, right and centre. They don’t have any more money even to pay higher bills never mind higher interest rate charges.

We can’t change the fact that we have experienced a money supply induced asset bubble but we can change the way in which we deal with it.

Bollard be brave: if you need to do anything to interest rates just cut them. If you can’t see what’s coming then close your eyes and feel it.

Nationalisation of Northern Rock signals the End of Banking as we know it

It’s astonishing but not entirely unexpected. The British taxpayer is the proud owner of the Northern Rock and 100bln worth of loans. It’s a sad reflection on the state of the UK banking system that they can’t find a buyer for this.

But this simply hastens the decline of the banking system as we know it. In 10-20 years time we will look back on this and see how important this moment was. What the banking system or indeed money looks like remains to be seen but our trust in current arrangements must be questioned.

More importantly for football fans is the Northern Rock’s sponsorship of Newcastle. Surely the taxpayer won’t be happy about this. Supposedly the sponsorship is safe but they said that about Northern Rock.

Financial Advisors paying up for bad decisions

2007 was a poor year for investors in finance companies but it was a worse year for the financial advisers who directed those investors. Many investors, or more accurately, clients are taking legal action against their advisers. Some of the stories are quite unbelievable with advisers directing money into investments which struggled to meet any kind of benchmark relating to their clients risk parameters and investment goals.

Sadly many financial advisers have little market experience and come from the selling side of the business. It’s the old “churn and burn” mentality. They can’t manage risk because they don’t know much about it. They simply direct the traffic into a range of investment choices differing marginally in yield.

Many advisers are now paying clients out in full to avoid legal action. Fair enough. They act in a position of trust and supposed expertise and should be accountable.