Another day, another bail out but this time they have thrown the play book out the window.

It feels like a 4th down with 80m to go and 10 seconds on the clock.

Game over.

Wrap up the toxic stuff (we’ve heard that before) and hopefully it will all go away. Strange that Goldmans have been spared the ignominy of going under as Paulson comes in to the rescue. Anyone wondering about the Goldmans cabal at the centre of a government that always yells out “we had no choice” will be muttering feverishly about the intervention on Friday.

Forget about whether the US should lose its AAA rating or the $ be heaved off the cliff, what concerns me is the idea that ex-market players are running the public finances. Why not let all the banks fail? If that’s the outcome of the “free market” then let it happen. As long as depositors money is safe the rest is a simple case of caveat emptor.

The taxpayer is picking up the bill so why not pay as little as possible.

And what then you ask? Well the banking system will be nationalised to a point, focused in the issuance of money as opposed to making loans. The point is that there are elements of our financial system that we could well do without.

They said the Titanic was unsinkable.

After a 1200 pt rally in the Dow the market has come to its senses and started bailing again. It’s a year now since Bear Stearns stumped up $3bln plus to bail out one of its funds thereby signalling the start of the crisis.

The news is bad wherever you look but the focus now is on the banks and whether they will be able to shore up their balance sheets which have more holes than a block of Emmental.

The pressure of continued write downs will simply hasten the inevitable collapse of a major institution. The big question is how the banks will be re-capitalised.

The first wave of capital provided by overseas investors has resulted in major losses and burnt fingers. Sovereign funds may be a little more wary this time round even if the price is way cheaper.

The Naked Capitalist reports on discussions the Fed has been having with private equity companies to see if they might be interested in stumping up some cash. However, there are issues of bank ownership and the size of stake any non-bank organisation can take. The word is that the Fed could seek to relax these rules.

This does not fill one with confidence.

Closer to home NZ finance companies are collapsing like a house of cards. It’s hard to know if any will be left. Already prosecutions are underway against accountants who signed off on the books of failed companies. I wonder how bank auditors will be feeling when they come to sign off the books of the major banks and see a long list of assets “uanble to be valued” properly.

There should be caveats galore.

But the question remains as to whether the crisis will spread to the major banks. If it does we could see queues around the corner of all our financial institutions before too long. I’d certainly advise people to have a bit of cash set aside and money spread around various banks. Having said that NZ is one of the only countries in the OECD not have have deposit insurance for banks.

Given the central banks moves so far it’s safe to say the banking system is underwritten to some degree but if you own shares in a bank i would be very uncomfortbale about that.

New Zealand joins its larger and more illustrious economies, the U.S. and the U.K., on the slippery slope with the release today of pretty poor employment numbers. 29,000 jobs lost is no small number for a small economy and with retail numbers looking very soft as well, the Reserve Bank will soon be reaching for the “cut” lever on its interest rate management dashboard.

Regardless of the credit crunch, employment really is the key to how the economy will fare. As long as people are employed then somehow they can get by and service their debts. Well mostly. But now this will see a deeper problem emerge and that is one where people simply cannot service mortgages or debt in any way.

This will reverberate throughout the whole economy. Added to this is a report out today showing house sales down 40% in the last quarter and 53% lower last month from the previous year.

Ouch.

We’re starting to see real signs of a weakening house market here in New Zealand. Sales for Auckland’s top real estate company are down over 50% and a recent auction saw a 6% clearance rate.

I decided ton investigate this myself in Christchurch and looked at some properties recently. One i saw was a 3 bedroom unit which had been bought for $375,000 a year ago. It could be rented for about $350 a week maybe a bit more if it had some money spent on it. It wasn’t in great condition but looked a reasonable investment property.

It was auctioned yesterday and passed in at $317,500. It still hasn’t sold.

We’re not really seeing this come through into prices yet because we only get the median price which is often misleading. In fact it can go up if a few properties sell in the higher brackets and none in the lower levels.

But it’s clear that prices are falling quite heavily in many areas and there is a buyers strike on at the moment.

Although there is the belief that property prices increase regardless the market is clearly starting to realise that capital gains are not guaranteed and therefore investors are starting to look more closely at the maths.

Mortgage rates are 9.5% for 2 years fixed. Yields are 3-5% and prices are falling. Even with the negative equity tax break that’s a big yield gap to fill. There is also the issue of not being able to borrow 100% of the price anymore.

With many fixed rates rolling over this year to much higher rates, the squeeze is really on. This will really start to impact when banks ask for properties to be revalued and then ask for extra equity.

Property investors, like banks, are facing a major liquidity crisis.  Price falls of 10-20% may not be as outlandish as previously thought.

Following on from their generous bail out of Northern Rock, the UK Government, otherwise know as the taxpayer, has opened its arms to any old piece of paper banks have sitting around on their balance sheet.

Or to be more accurate, the Bank of England will accept mortgage backed securities in return for government bonds. Nice trade if you cant get it. The amounts mentioned are 50 to 200bln pounds (where the hell is my pound key?) but basically it’s a free for all.

Now we can expect to see banks reaching for the refinancing button in order to take advantage of this. RBS has already put its hand up for 10 to 12bln of fresh capital plus a 6bln write down.

Ok so its just more mess. The markets may rally on this hoping it can help clear the looming crisis in the mortgage market but the numbers are really starting to mount up and this is just very bad news indeed.

The key issue here is the capital adequacy of the banking system. It’s proven to be the achilles heel which is why the authorities have had no option but to underwrite the system.

Given this exposure of the fragility of the banking system it is time to ask questions about capital adequacy and the way banks are regulated and allowed to operate.

Merrills realeased another $9bln from trading losses and decided to fire 4000 people who probably never made a trade in their life. That brings the total for 3 quarters to $29bln, a not insignificant sum.

Citigroup was in there as well with another $5bln loss for the quarter and another 9000 jobs to go in addition to the 13000 already on the streets.  Naturally the stock rallied…phew only $5bln!

It’s interesting to see how far this continues because this isn’t a good show at all. The numbers just keep getting bigger and bigger. Citigroup still has $60bln worth of exposure to sub-prime and other loans. What worries me is the 7.7% Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio.

That is what this is all about. Leverage to the hilt and be damned. Banks have become nothing more than licenced fronts for gambling.  Fair enough but that isn’t why people deposit their money in them.

Safe as houses? Well that depends what the house is worth.