The recent financial crisis has made me think more about how important money is in our lives. Without the liquidity (cash) pumped into the system by the Federal Reserve the whole financial system could, and probably would, have siezed up.

By that i mean the flow of money would have dried up and banks would have stopped lending and peopl would have run out of money and been queueing at the banks to get cash out. Of course there isn’t any but you knew that already

It shows us two important facets of our society: one is that we depend on the financial system for our daily lives; two is that we are living on the verge of a serious breakdown. It’s a bit like trying to stay on top of the bills.

I don;t know if there are any readers who remember the Depression but they will understand what i am talking about.

I believe we are all systems within systems, whether at the atomic level, individual being or universe. Systems depend on flow and feedback in order to keep stable. We need energy through food or sunlight to survive.

The parellels of the financial crisis and oil crisis are interesting. I remember back towards the turn of the millenium when we had a mini crisis in the UK when oil deliveries were delayed . The supermarkets were within 24 hours of running out of food since they used just in time delivery. The crucial importance of energy (in the form of oil) was highlighted but more than that it showed how close to the edge we were living.

We depend on a continual flow of energy to survive. This brings me to love. Yes that old favourite. We can’t do without that either. The great thing about love is that it is free and easy to give. But as we know, when love is lacking and not flowing our system breaks down: into war, violence, depression and death. Without a flow of love nothing is worth living for. We can see the effects all around us.

Surely love is something we can never run out of

Following on from my previous piece I have just viewed a couple of interesting videos projecting how the web may develop in the future courtesy of Richard MacManus.

Whilst there is a certain amount of PR spin and product placement going on here they are both worth a look at if you have a spare 15 minutes. As i noted previously it is reminiscent of the 1920s and the media battle that took place from there on. Same stuff, different technology?

You can catch them here

Where would we be without the internet? Could we live without Google for a day even? Well they tried that and found there are plenty of other engines out there worth looking at. But the real question for me was not whether we could live without Google for a day but whether Google is still the future of the internet.

This is a more challenging question. As Branton Kenton-Dau, my colleague over at VortexDNA, notes the internet is a self organising system constantly feeding off the energy provided by creators and imaginators. So far Google has kept this energy focused through itself by either developing new services or simply buying in what they like.

There is no problem with big…..big can be good but big requires a lot more energy to self-sustain. The beauty of the web is that it reflects demands so quickly. It is essentially democratic in its processing, beautiful and free…well not quite. It has the capacity to be controlled and regulated which we have seen all too frequently.

But i have a feeling that the internet as we know it may reorganise itself by deconstructing and coming back to life in a different form. This may well be opposite to what we have now where we go out to look for things. In the next stage of development things will come looking for us. We will be the filter for our web and we will be the center of it.

There will be no more ranking only relevance decided by us. We will configure the web to ourselves with no one interfering with or controlling what we see. I’m excited about this vision because it offers so much.

How we get there is anyone’s guess but that’s the beauty of systems.

Professor Peter Brown from McGill University in Canada is here in New Zealand speaking about our dysfunctional economic system.

He’s not wrong there. He was speaking on Radio NZ but the interview never really got going. He had enough time to talk about the incoherent nature of our economic system, how GDP measures income and consumption but not well being and how triple bottom line accounting was a waste of time. Agreed!

What we need is a better connection between our biophysical system and our economic frameworks like Trucost for example.

We also need to ask ourselves some basic questions such as

- what is our economy for? speculation or sustenance.

- what size should it be? as big as possible or big enough.

Simple questions but rarely asked. The mantra of economic growth at all costs is intellectually flimsy. Its lazy thinking……..the assumption that GDP growth is all that matters is quite clearly false.

What about crime, illness, pollution? What about the increasing gap between rich and poor.

As individuals we search for coherence but as a global economy we struggle to find that because there are no tools to do so. So perhaps by becoming more coherent ourselves we will aid and enable a global coherence.

As the Mahatma said “Be the change you wish to see”.

Let’s keep asking questions of our system.