I like this piece from Micheal Coote on the NZ Securities Commission. He contrasts the approach of US authorities in throwing the book at white collar fraudsters with the rather ame approach of Seccom here in simply posting binding undertakings on its website from offending parties.

It reminds me that nearly 4 years agao i tried to interest Jane Diplock and the Commission in looking at finance companies. There was no reply. Sometimes i wonder what they get paid for. Trawling through their website I came across this speech by Jane Diplock to the International Investment Funds Assocation late in 2007. She is also the Chairman of the International Organisation of Securities Commissions.

It was a mind numbingly boring speech about global regulation of capital markets. Read it if you can’t sleep tonight. What surprises me the most is the lack of concern about the state of global markets, given the speech was dated 1st November 2007. That just about sums it up for me.

What have they been doing? Not much from what I can see. Meanwhile 17 NZ finance companies have gone under and the global capital markets are in dissarray.

But wait maybe they are onto something going by her concluding remarks

“We are at the cusp of a new global adventure into new realms of mutual recognition and consistent standards around the world. We live in exciting times!”

Strewth!

Jim Anderton, a senior member of cabinet and supporter of Helen Clark, has had a good crack at the NZ banks calling them “authors of their own misfortune”.

With lending up 14.3% in the last year he’s not wrong.

And with Lombard the 17th NZ finance company to hit the wall some serious questions must be asked about the health of the NZ financial system.

Deborah Hill Cone , the Hermione Granger of NZ journalism, has been banging on about this for many years now focusing mainly on the Hanover Group which surprisingly hasn’t gone under….yet.

Back in March 2004 she wrote a big piece on it for the NBR which prompted me to write to various MPs and the Finance Minister to express concern about the finance company sector as a whole. The only MP who took interest in it was John Key, the then shadow finance minister, whilst Michael Cullen, the current one, gave the standard response that the system was well regulated.

We also hear that Tower has closed a mortgage fund after a run on funds on a day that centre left leaders met in London to discuss urgent reform of global financial markets. Helen Clark was there and no doubt expressed her concern.

Perhaps her focus should be a little closer to home?

2007 was a poor year for investors in finance companies but it was a worse year for the financial advisers who directed those investors. Many investors, or more accurately, clients are taking legal action against their advisers. Some of the stories are quite unbelievable with advisers directing money into investments which struggled to meet any kind of benchmark relating to their clients risk parameters and investment goals.

Sadly many financial advisers have little market experience and come from the selling side of the business. It’s the old “churn and burn” mentality. They can’t manage risk because they don’t know much about it. They simply direct the traffic into a range of investment choices differing marginally in yield.

Many advisers are now paying clients out in full to avoid legal action. Fair enough. They act in a position of trust and supposed expertise and should be accountable.

The recent Bank of England action is completely necessary though wrong in terms of moral hazard. In order to understand why this is the case i exhort you to read John Tomlinson’s paper which is in the research section or here. In his paper  he explains how a bank works in terms of taking in deposits and lending out money. He dissects carefully the balance sheet of Barclays Bank and shows how solvency is merely a trick of the imagination.

Of course readers of this blog will already know that money is merely a ficition, one with a deep and dark history. As Trevor commented in the previous post, the general public relies on he integrity of the system and the honesty of those who operate it.

Can we have confidence in those people? I think not. Not because they are dishonest  but because they refuse to acknowledge a system that is unstabl, inequitable and ultimately inefficient.

Please read and ask questions, comment, spread the word and ponder.  What does your money mean? Do you really have any savings, wealth or assets? Don’t rely on the system to support you. It has failed regularly since the Bank of England was first formed and wil l continue to do so until some serious surgery has been performed.

I just heard this news an hour ago and frankly was astounded. The Bank of England will ,if necessary, guarantee all deposits held with Northern Rock. This a major change to the current depositors insurance scheme.

Wow! In a stroke they have just removed any risk from the banking system. They have in effect nationalised Northern Rock without actually doing so.

Actually this is a good thing since it further exposes the myth behind our banking system. Mind you they didn’t rush to bail out the depositors of BCCI  when that failed.

So where to from here? Well that’s anyones guess but this wont finish here even with the  blank cheque provided the the Old Lady.

Max Hastings writes a lovely piece here. Finally as the party comes to an end and the hangover kicks in, will there be some reason?

I hope so. It is a great opportunity to look closely at the money system we currently have. Do not look to our central bankers to provide the lead or even our politicians. We the people will have to provide ideas, answers and solutions on how to proceed. The monetary reform movement has been growing by the day and now it is time to stand up and be heard.

I’m in Europe for a month, making my first trip back since heading to live in NZ nearly 6 years ago. Currently i’m having a lovely time in Southern Spain in a pretty little village called Benahavis.

Watching the UK news is so different: small soundbites, nothing too deep and its making me dizzy. But not as dizzy as those pictures of people queuing up at their local Northern Rock to get all their money out.

They seem so calm about it without quite realising the ramifications of their actions. A run on a major bank in the UK? Who would have thought it could happen in the modern well regulated era.

We have seen finance companies in NZ topple over like dominoes but the general public has taken the view that they were accidents waiting to happen and that people should have taken more care in what they were investing in. But a major financial institution would be a different story.

For money reformers the recent credit crisis was inevitable, a product of the incessant growth in the global money supply. How it will play out is anyone’s guess but there has never been a better time to expose the weakness and corruption at the heart of our money systems.

In the meantime people should check to make sure they do not have to much exposure to any single financial entity. What is amazing to me is how the stock markets have proved so resilient. There is lots of talk about the strength of the underlying economy but the effects of these recent months will take a long time to feed through.

I have a feeling this story has a long way to go.