Well Christmas brought some quiet stability to the markets but the New Year has seen an immediate stampede for the exit. What is so interesting about the current economic malaise is that it’s very hard to analyze with any clarity. No one really knows what is going to happen because we’ve never had a crisis of this magnitude before.

We know the credit bubble has well and truly burst. We’ve seen it before with Japan but that was really a closed market and the response was non existent thus causing a 15 year depression. We have Central Banks who are very keen and swift to act but will their actions just make things worse. Henry Paulson today said a correction was inevitable given the price increases of the last 5 years.

Nice to know the guys running the country are on top of things….crickey! Can anyone explain what a stable economic system looks like. Clearly the current bunch of economic leaders haven’t got a clue.

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard argues that we are experiencing a 1929 type situation. I think he is spot on. The bailouts we’ve seen recently could well become more widespread. If that happens then quite clearly the stock markets will fall another 10%. The impact on BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) will decide whether the global financial system collapses or not.

Immediate rate cuts will be forthcoming from the Fed, BOE and maybe even the ECB. All this nonsense about watching inflation needs to be ignored. Inflation will keep being a problem but its a diversion. 2 years out and land prices could be off by 30% or more.

Investing now is for the brave hearted, foolish and very wealthy following the maxim “The way to make a small fortune is to start with a large one”.

Its like watching a disaster movie in slow motion. To see the Fed so far on the back foot is disconcerting to say the least. The recent $40bln credit injection has just left the market needing more and stocks floundering.

For the first time I am asking myself whether we have a Japan style bank crisis developing. My immediate response is to say no because we haven’t had the screaming bubble of the equivalence they experienced in Japan but one could look back to the bubble of 2000/2001 and feel it was merely reinflated by the post 9/11 easing. This easing further invigorated the property bubble and took it to new heights along with financial practices that were dubious at best.

We have a situation where the banking system, in the wider sense, is stuck with a serious number of non-performing loans and this number could easily escalate if the recent liquidity measures don’t work. In Japan the policy response was to duck it and hope it would go away. The US has addressed it head on so far but will they allow banks to go under and house prices to tumble further. The maintenance of confidence is crucial in any fractional reserve fiat based money system and so far it seems like the US authorities are no taking any chances.

What if this doesn’t work? Then we will have a serious problem and global stock markets will take a 20-30% hit. I’m not making any predictions but cash still works for me.

The G7 communiques are out (i can’t find a link at the moment as i have it direct from a trading platform) and there is one clear story and several cloudy ones. The main thrust is that they would like to see the Yuan quicken its appreciation. Well looking at China’s trade surplus that’s pretty obvious. One only has to remember the famous Yen “endaka” from 1971 to 1995 when the $ fell from 360 to just below 80 Yen.

How far will the Yuan rise is anyone’s guess. The day it floats and becomes fully convertible will see a huge increase in volatility and speculative financial flows. However a floating Yuan would actually be beneficial in regulating global imbalances in trade and economic growth.

The Chinese are well aware of it and are probably not minded to open the doors to the Magic Kingdom just yet. They hold the balance of power at the moment and wont be pushed until they are ready. Still continued pressure will eventually tell.

However, it’s not just the Chinese getting a telling off. Some mention has been made of Asia as a whole and of course this refers to Japan. Whilst there was no specific mention of the Yen this will certainly not be lost on those with substantial short yen positions. There was mention of an improving economic situation in Japan and that exchange rates should reflect fundamentals.

The risk inherent in global carry trades was mentioned specifically by Juncker (Luxembourgs PM) saying they wanted the market to be aware of the risks of one way bets, specifically in the foreign exchange markets.

Paulson (US Treasury Sec) mentioned clearly and loudly that the US believed in a strong dollar. Added to that were moans from the ECB crew about the strength of the Euro and how they were bearing the brunt of $ weakness.

The Canadians jumped in on this wagon too noting the Loony is now 3% stronger than the Greenback. Strange times indeed.

So what does all this mean. Well for me it could means the $ depreciation is nearing an end or at least getting into the red zone. From a market perspective i would say NZ/Yen is due for more pounding (back below 80 again) given this is regarded as the major one way bet in the fx markets. The Euro may reverse back to 1.35, the C$ back above parity and the A$ probably could do with a small dusting (maybe down to 85cts).

Stocks could also get pounded this week. Who knows? It’s not a week to be hugely long and comfortable.

FX rates are elastic things and when they get stretched the bounceback (as we saw in August) can be pretty fierce.

P.S. Others may interpret the communique differently so feel free to give me some of your views.

On June 11th the RBNZ intervened in the NZ$ by selling NZ$ around the US$0.7660 level in thin markets. This was followed up by another bout or two resulting in short term sell offs to US$0.76.

This action has create a fair bit of comment most of it apoplectic in nature focusing on the poor NZ central bank against the might of global speculators. The commentary uniformly blasted the RB and trotted out the story of how George Soros buried the Bank of England back in 1992.

Well this is one time i can say “i was there” as i was actually trading Stg at the time, with the regular trader lying on a beach in the Carribean. It was a crazy time to be in the markets but when you were the focal point of action that feeling was magnified. The Bank of England phone line was running hot as we called up to sell more and more Stg. The voice on the other end of the phone was resigned to the ship going down.

It duly did. The next day i had my biggest one day loss in 12 years of trading as the market all but disappeared and every customer was looking to trade. I remember my broker took me out to dinner at the casino in Park Lane to recover. Nice.

But the main point of this story is that Stg was way overvalued and stuck in the ERM where it was required under the Maastricht Treaty to keep the Pound above a certain level which was DM2.7780.

So the Old Lady was just doing her job. She wasn’t taking on Soros or the market but just fulfilling legal obligations. Soros made a bet that the UK would have to pull out of the ERM and that was a political action and you can be sure he would have done his homework there.

So it is very different to what we see when the BOJ intervenes in the Yen at 100 or 145 where there is no legal cap but an extreme extension in rates.

The RBNZ action falls into this camp. The NZ$ is appreciating well beyond fundamentals based on the current account deficit, PPP comparisons and problems for the export sector to sell its goods. It is also suffering from carry trade side effects which are causing a huge inflow of short term investment to take advantage of high interest rates.

Its intervention is justified on those grounds. The NZ$ should be trading around US$0.60 which is just above its long term average. Of course currency rates can run way beyond what might be considered justifiable and for some period of time.

The Great Game continues in the global financial markets where the US sells it paper to trading nations such as Japan and now China in return for goods. One day this game may stop and the US$ will go into freefall.

The same could happen to the NZ$. I would say the RBNZ intervention is justified though how effective it is remains to be seen. Jeff Gamlin at the NBR is quite positive on the profit implications and it’s certainly a good long term trade to buy some foreign reserves. They should be selling as much Kiwi as possible!

As it happens intervention usually works if the intervening bank has some justification. Remember currency speculators like to make money. They don’t care whether it’s up or down.

The RBNZ is in a tight spot regardless of what Grant Spencer, the Deputy Governor , says. They will need a bit of luck to get this right and will need to continue intervening if required at higher levels like 78 and 80. I think though they will be safe there as people are starting to feel the pinch of higher rates.

Also yesterday the Japanese Minister of Finance weighed into the fray with some well placed comments. The Japanese are the experts in intervention and jawboning the currency. That shot across the bows should not be ignored.